<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confidence in my voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getmewriting.com/motivation/confidence-in-my-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getmewriting.com/motivation/confidence-in-my-voice/</link>
	<description>A blog for creative writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.getmewriting.com/motivation/confidence-in-my-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getmewriting.com/?p=213#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Interesting thing about description - Mr. Stephen King says don&#039;t bother describing your characters&#039; appearance in great detail. And, thinking about it (and paying more attention to this as I read), very few authors do. I think a couple of details is enough for someone to make some kind of image. Maybe one very specific thing that also helps to tell something about their personality, too.

That novel I was writing didn&#039;t go anywhere by the way. My ideas for it didn&#039;t hang together very well at all. Maybe I&#039;ll come back to it later, but it will be a rewrite for the most part methinks. In the mean time, I&#039;m doing other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thing about description &#8211; Mr. Stephen King says don&#8217;t bother describing your characters&#8217; appearance in great detail. And, thinking about it (and paying more attention to this as I read), very few authors do. I think a couple of details is enough for someone to make some kind of image. Maybe one very specific thing that also helps to tell something about their personality, too.</p>
<p>That novel I was writing didn&#8217;t go anywhere by the way. My ideas for it didn&#8217;t hang together very well at all. Maybe I&#8217;ll come back to it later, but it will be a rewrite for the most part methinks. In the mean time, I&#8217;m doing other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.getmewriting.com/motivation/confidence-in-my-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getmewriting.com/?p=213#comment-584</guid>
		<description>I have this very same problem with the voice.  I often wonder if the actual text gets through what I see so clearly in my head.  Oftentimes, i dont think it does, since I never describe my characters.  But then, I never really see my characters.  I watch them, and I know them, but I never really have faces to them.  Hmm, maybe this is good for another post.

Aside from that, I know what you mean about the dry writing.  I&#039;m currently reading Risk, by Dan Gardner.  Its all about how dangerous the things that we perceive as dangerous actually are.  I was well into ot for the first two chapters, but as with most non fiction books (especially ones about statisitics), it does get dry and somewhat repetative.

On a more positive note, I have always found your style of writing very engaging.  I remember the book you started in university, that you workshopped in some of our classes, and I was truely interested to see where that went.  (Where did it go?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this very same problem with the voice.  I often wonder if the actual text gets through what I see so clearly in my head.  Oftentimes, i dont think it does, since I never describe my characters.  But then, I never really see my characters.  I watch them, and I know them, but I never really have faces to them.  Hmm, maybe this is good for another post.</p>
<p>Aside from that, I know what you mean about the dry writing.  I&#8217;m currently reading Risk, by Dan Gardner.  Its all about how dangerous the things that we perceive as dangerous actually are.  I was well into ot for the first two chapters, but as with most non fiction books (especially ones about statisitics), it does get dry and somewhat repetative.</p>
<p>On a more positive note, I have always found your style of writing very engaging.  I remember the book you started in university, that you workshopped in some of our classes, and I was truely interested to see where that went.  (Where did it go?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
